當前位置:學識網 > 英語知識 > 英語寫作 > 英語作文 > 英語作文

2020年8月29日雅思大作文預測及范文

2020-11-29信息舉報

在雅思考試前,考生可以重點總結一下今年的考題有什么特點,考試趨勢是什么,可以指導我們有效的進行備考。今天小編給大家整理了2020年8月29日雅思大作文預測及范文,我們一起來看看吧!

2020年8月29日雅思大作文預測及范文

2020年8月29日雅思大作文預測及范文1

觀點類大作文,旅游類話題

Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目大意

當今,國際旅游是世界上最大產業。不幸的是,國際旅游給來自不同文化的人們帶來了關系的緊張而不是相互的理解。你在多大程度上同意還是不同意?

寫作思路解析

??題干兩句話。但是第一句話為陳述句無邏輯考點,第二句為討論話題,兩句間無明確因果邏輯關系,單觀點議論文出題方式,考察比較關系。

?? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 在多大程度上同意或不同意出題方式。

?? 話題類型:旅游+國際化。話題詞 international tourism, tension, understanding, different cultures

高分寫作示范

Recent decades have witnessed the flourish in global traveling and it has become a lifestyle for the normal people. Some contend that this trend has caused tension between diverse cultures rather than enhancement of understanding, but I find such opinion flawed and hard to justify.

Admittedly, international tourism seems to bring some misunderstanding between local populace and foreign travelers. For example, many people believe that the tourism have aggravated or spoiled the visited locations due to pollution and littering. However, it seems to me that these bad behaviors are not caused by international tourism, but by the lack of personal moral principles, and even some of the locals have these flaws too. Meanwhile, with close supervision and rigid regulations, these issues can be strategically addressed.

Therefore, I personally believe that the international tourism should be promoted because of its enormous benefits, especially in the aspect related to the enhancement of understanding of diverse cultures. First of all, this kind of tourism can certainly make travelers access and feel the first-hand experience,by which I mean experiencing cultural differences in person can substantially stimulate people's curiosity and desire for exploration. Therefore, it is not rare that travelers fall in love with the culture of the host country and work as cultural ambassadors later. Besides, international tourism eases tension between people of various nationalities through enhancing multicultural communication. In other words, although reading the second hand information presented on the social media or other publications may partially ease the misunderstanding caused by the ignorance and prejudice, we find it confusing to interpret or complying with diverging cultural norms without experiencing civilizations on a first hand basis. Luckily, traveling gives people a feasible solution by the means of accessing the different land.

In conclusion, international tourism connects people in various countries rather than separating them. Far from causing tension, international tourism improves people's relationship from different cultures.

相關詞匯和語法結構

Populace 百姓/平民

Proficiency 熟練

Rare 稀有

Host countries 所在國

Ambassador 大使

Enhancement 提升

Interpret 解釋

Diverging 偏離

Address 解決加強

Flaws 瑕疵

Firsthand 一手,親自

nuisances 麻煩事兒

2020年8月29日雅思大作文預測及范文2

觀點類大作文,政府類話題

Some people think it is more important for the government to spend more money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illnesses than the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目大意

一些人認為,政府花更多的錢提倡健康的生活方式,以預防疾病,比治療已經生病的人更重要。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

思路解析

不同意

當然,有一些人認為,政府支出應該更好地通過促進健康的生活方式來預防疾病的發生,而不是用來治療那些已經生病的人。對他們來說,目前沒有健康問題但正在等待更好生活條件的人數總是多于后者。這意味著宏觀經濟配置首先要滿足大多數納稅主體的需要,以確保投資的說服力。如果這些資金流用于有機食品生產、住宅環境中的健身設施,甚至更好的空氣條件,那么這些資金流就被認為是有用的。它們更接近公眾的日常健康,而且在某種程度上很容易被證明可以避免某些與食物相關的、久坐不動和污染導向的疾病。而投資在醫療行業的支出似乎比較“隱形”,因為總是只有少數人有身體問題,也很難判斷這筆錢最終是否有價值。治療也存在失敗;要驗證治愈的患者是因為醫療設施的資金投入還是僅僅因為他們的免疫力而痊愈,這聽起來很模糊。

然而,上面提出的想法并沒有讓人想到醫療領域的投資可能具有的真正重要性,并使他們無法認識到潛在的危險和不合理的一面。無論如何提倡健康生活,我們都必須承認,在某些情況下,我們目前所知的“健康”生活方式并不能有效地“防病”。那么,在衛生史上,一些自相矛盾的健康規則,考慮到某些生活習慣可能是有意義的,或者是有害的,最終被證明是不能接受的,這也就不足為奇了。這還不是全部的事實,直到我們也意識到,對于某些疾病來說,僅僅健康的生活方式肯定是不夠的。如果沒有系統的醫療專業知識、設施或資源來應對疾病,人們更容易患上疾病。在這種情況下,投資于健康生活推廣是非常沒有意義的。提示語中的短視思維,使我們不能理性地思考“重要性”的真正含義;因此,這兩個投資方向的重要性是不可比擬的,因為我們對目前的醫療保健和對未知的未來的了解仍然有限。

高分寫作示范

To access whether the government should invest money in the prevention of illness or the related treatment, I might have to consider how to define certain utterances made by this topic. From the perspective of the government, it is reasonable for them to spend money in the area that is beneficial to the overwhelming people; however, the take-home message is how the government is to define “importance”.

There are, of course, people out there holding that government spending should be better given out to prevent diseases from haening via promoting a healthy lifestyle rather than to treat those who have already been ill. To them, the number of people currently without health problems but awaiting a better living condition is always more than that of the latter. That means the macro-economic allocation should firstly fulfill the need of most of the tax contributors to make sure the investment is persuasive. The financial flows are considered useful if they are used to things like organic food produce, fitness facilities set in residential surroundings, or even better air condition. They are much closer to the daily health of the public and would be somewhat easily proved to avoid certain food-related, sedentariness-driven, and pollution-oriented illnesses. Whereas the expenditure invested in the medical industry seems comparatively “invisible”, as it is always enjoyed solely by the minority who are put into the physical problems, and would be also hard to judge whether this money would be finally valuable. There also exist failures in the treatment; it sounds obscured to verify whether the cured patients get well because of the financial input in the medical facilities or just because of their immunity.

However, the thinking presented above doesn’t allow one to think of real importance that the investment in the medical area may have, and precludes them from recognizing the potential hazards and irrationality that lie. No matter how a healthy life is to promote, one must admit that in some cases, the lifestyle that is deemed “healthy” by our current knowledge cannot effectively “prevent illness”. Then it is not surprising that in the hygiene history, some paradoxical health rules considering certain living habits would be meaningful or harmful, have finally been proved unacceptable. We should also realize that for certain illnesses, the solely healthy lifestyle is certainly not enough. People are prone to diseases easily if there were no systematic medical expertise, facilities, or resources in dealing with them. In that case, investing in a healthy life promotion is spectacularly meaningless. The myopic thinking given in the prompt distracts us from rationally thinking what the “importance” truly means; it is then incomparable between the two investment directions in terms of the importance because of our still limited knowledge to our current health care and to the unknown future.

In conclusion, I would agree that the policy of government investing in a healthy lifestyle cannot be considered more significant than in disease treatment.

相關詞匯和語法結構

Utterance 表達

Allocation 分配

Irrationality 不合理性


以上內容來自互聯網,請自行判斷內容的正確性。若本站收錄的信息無意侵犯了貴司版權,請給我們來信(xspiccom@163.com),我們會及時處理和回復,謝謝.
  • 返回頂部
  • 麻将现金棋牌平台 (★^O^★)MG超级高速公路之王试玩网站 (^ω^)MG西部边境送彩金 (★^O^★)MG日日进财新手攻略 mg电子花花公子大奖图 广西快3走势图 (★^O^★)MG圣诞企鹅_电子游艺 香港四不像一肖中特 (★^O^★)MG疯狂麻将_最新版 福建36选7新中奖规则 (^ω^)MG追寻太阳_稳赢版 (★^O^★)MG水果大爆发_最新版 (-^O^-)MG失落的国度怎么玩 (★^O^★)MG足球狂欢节爆分技巧 吉林快三开奖结果83期 (*^▽^*)MG时界门之将军爆分技巧 106彩票